Michael Stevens wrote:
> I hate even making another post to this thread, but your insistence
> that I
> am lying makes it necessary to show how you misinterrupterpt what
> really
> happened.
No. It's your inability to get the better of
me that drives you onward.
"Onward MS Soldiers! Marching as to war.
With the cross of
Windows, going on before!"
If I were the person you try to characterize
me as, then what I say
would be totally inconsequential to you, and you would feel no need to
respond to anything I "insist" about. But obviously that isn't the
case, what I say means too much to you, so much that you just can't
leave me be.
> If you really looked at the thread I
replied to, you would realize I
> would
> not ever "export" to such an irrelevant thread as this one.
Why would I come to that conclusion? I thought
it made total sense
because you opened your first post in this thread by saying that I give
good information. "You give good information freely, but when you are
confronted and have no real answer you become an as*hole." In the other
thread, that would not have made sense, because you wouldn't have
characterized anything I said in that thread as "good information," as
your whole moronic point in that thread was that I "ragging on Carey
unjustly and . . . . won't admit it."
> I was
> replying
> from a remote desktop and for some reason my newsgroup rules did not
> show
> the same results. I copied the reply from the remote desktop system I
> was
> accessing the newsgroups to the computer I usually post from and that
> I made
> the original reply that was lost. I did a CTRL+H and posted to what I
> thought was the same thread. I quickly scanned the post, saw a Mike
> and
> thought it was the correct thread.
You saw one Mike post!
!
You are the only Mike that has posted to
this thread, and you hadn't posted to this thread yet, before your
"mistake!" Either you are the most unobservant person on the
planet, or your "mistake" was one of your own creation.
http://www.microscum.com/misc/BS/Recoverythread.jpg
http://www.microscum.com/misc/BS/WPAthread.jpg
The original thread can't be viewed in it's
entirety on 1024x768 screen.
This thread, before your "mistake," would have fit on a 800x600 screen
with room to spare! And now you are seeing delusions too. "I quickly
scanned the post, saw a Mike . . . ." yet there wasn't a Mike that
posted to this thread, before your "mistake."
"Methinks thou dost 'squeal' too much!"
> All the rest of the crap you posted
> assumes your assessment of my mistake was intentional. Just like the
> original accusation of my LIE, this also a BIG misunderstanding.
Yeah, you misunderstood over & over again then,
even after being
repeatedly told and shown your "misunderstanding!" If it acts like a
duck, looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck . . . . " You certainly
are no swan!
You should take heed of what you call "unsubstantanative
[sic] crap."
You
would have a much easier time trying to convince people that I have some
agenda against you, by making me come to you, instead of continually
putting yourself in my way. You're like a bitch that begs a guy to f*ck
her, only to cry rape later. Stop being a victim of your own creation!
If you really think I'm such a scumbag USENET rapist, stop going out of
your way to reply to my posts to other people! Make me stalk you,
instead of you
stalking me! But then you would have nothing to squeal about, because I
hardly ever reply to your posts to others. And we all know how much you
love to squeal!
Do you have anymore squealing left in you,
Miss Piggy?
--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"